Conversation opened. 1 read message. Skip to content Using Gmail with screen readers in:sent 121 of 1,130 Jorn—Luck and Change kac attac Wed, Sep 13, 2023, 6:50 PM to Stefan LUCK AND CHANGE DAGGER AND GUITAR Asger Jorn The status of the aesthetic problems of the present day "One evening I sat Beauty on my knees - And I found her bitter And I abused her. I armed myself against justice. I fled. O witches, O misery, O hatred, to you my treasure was entrusted! .. Misfortune was my god. I stretched myself out in the mud. I dried myself in the air of crime. And I played some fine tricks on madness. And the spring brought the idiot's frightening laughter. - oh! every vice, anger, luxury - magnificent, that luxury - above all, falsehood and sloth." Arthur Rimbaud The two unsolved problems hindering further progress in the systemiza- tion of the scientific research of aesthetics today are the declining ability to give the topic a serviceable definition and the difficulty in finding the clear and tenable distinction between the object of aesthetics and the object of art, especially in the question of the essence of dance, music, poetry and pictorial art, that is to say, the essence of the fine arts. As far as these are concerned, an understanding has been generally reached that they are not identical with the aesthetie, but merely represent an especially effective and rarely failing technique for the exposition of aesthetic effects. Moreover, in certain circles there is also a gradually dawning feeling that the fine arts themselves never represent pure beauty, but are above all arts, and as such 20 COSMONAUTS OF THE FUTURE Texts from the Situationist Movement in Scandinavia and Elsewhere always more than beauty, with an effect going deeper and transmitting more than the purely aesthetic. This is something we touch upon here in the indication of the ethical character of art and which is manifested in more recent art by the pictorial content being moved from the aesthetic over to the magical, even though this word has to be understood in a new meaning as the expression of power. As far as the problem of aesthetic definition is concerned, then the difficulty lies in being unable to limit the aesthetic area to an easily compre- hensible field of activity with a clear distinction between the true methodical activity of aesthetics and auxiliary investigations into other disciplines, economics, sociology, politics, biology, psychology, technology, religion etc, from which benefit and experience can be derived. Furthermore, the blurred boundary between aesthetics and art also causes even the most rigorous sep- aration between aesthetics and the other philosophical areas (ethics, logic) to have no objective validity and to be based merely upon sensory illusion uncovered more and more by each new experience. If, in an attempt at empirical aesthetics, we take the road of expe- rience to find the aesthetic object in the articles and laws of beauty, we immediately come up against resistance from subjective judgement, which perceives the human being as a primary existence in relation to his thoughts. This judgement, the individual's judgement, takes its point of departure in the individual's reaction to the sensed object, a precondition and a point of departure which no one can deny. The objective synthesis If the individual judgement necessary to construct an aesthetic doctrine is to be coordinated with the aesthetic judgements of other individuals, then this can only happen by getting behind these judgements in order to analyse the common preconditions reflected in the internal psycho-physi- logical similarities and the bio-sociological dependence of the individu- als, as is done, for example, in medical science, to discover the common human subjectivity or the community of inter-human interest which is a bio-physiological, sociological and cultural fact. Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 21 The wider question then becomes whether this organic community of interest extends out over the human into the vegetable and animal king- doms, whether the whole biological world can be perceived as a collected in- terdependence, a fellowship of interest, an organic subjectivity and mutual necessity, and historically as an evolutionary unity, or, in short, whether we can make aesthetics relate to the natural sciences. However, to achieve a real objective aesthetics it is necessary to dem- onstrate a causal unity between the forms of reaction of the organic and the inorganie worlds which reaches from the macrocosmic aesthetics of the uni- verse itself to the atom's microcosmic reactions of an aesthetic character. If this is not possible, then the results of both subjective and objective aesthet- is are worthless and the establishment of a scientific aesthetics impossible. The synthesis for which I am here the spokesman definitively breaks with the intermixing of aesthetics and art theory, a break which is based upon new experiences and arguments, the most weighty of which is perhaps the recognition, derived from the development of modern art, of the value of so-called primitive art and the consequent understand- ing that aesthetic recognition and any acquaintanceship with the idea of beauty, the understanding even of the difference between the thing and its depiction, is quite meaningless for elemental artistic creation. As, into the bargain, it is apparent that modern aesthetic education, as known from the art academies, is directly restrictive to creative ability in art, these facts demonstrate that not only is the aesthetic knowledge of our time worthless but also directly damaging and thus, in other words, false. The extreme definition of aesthetics This acknowledgment, which is shared by all aestheticians, has gradually made it generally appreciated that aesthetics should not be understood as a phenomenon exclusively connected with the fine arts. On the contrary, it represents one of our forms of existential experience, its subjective point of departure in interest having forced science to perceive the object of aesthetics as impenetrable by exact, scientific research, so that it has to be perceived as something which can be described and to a certain 22 COSMONAUTS OF THE FUTURE Texts from the Situationist Movement in Scandinavia and Elsewhere extent limited, but not defined and computed, remaining a demonstrable and communicable unknown', which can throw its light over one of the problematic forms in which our being exposes itself, and thereby have an instructive significance for art and criticism. That this instructive significance is only to the detriment of both art and criticism has really nothing to do with science nor obviously the critics, but it involves artistic activity and the artists' working conditions themselves in the most painful way. Because of this inconvenience it must, of course, be the artists themselves who, by theoretical activity, have to intervene and change course about this point. What have I then been able to change in this hazy picture? Apparently something quite insignificant, as I have only tightened up this 'aesthetic definition' from being something unknown and enigmatic' to mean 'the unknoren' or everything unknown and enigmatic. By this clarification of the aesthetic object, it takes on not only a subjective and existential but also an objective and essential significance, from its smallest detail to its greatest context. This makes possible the establishment of the following outline, of which we will only have occasion in the following text to deal with the first half and point c. III. Brief outline of the fields of activity in aesthetic research Thesis: The aesthetic object is defined as the unknown, and aesthetics as the empirical science of the reactions of the known to the unknown or the unknown, unexpected or uncontrollable reactions of the known. 1. Objective aesthetics then becomes the empirical science of the immediate reactions of substances to other substances and of the character of the substance's macrocosmic and microcosmic phenomena towards the borders with the non-existent, and thus the effects of chance. 2. The aesthetics of the natural sciences then becomes the science of the reactions of biological organisms to Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 23 unknown, unaccustomed or unexpected impulses and of their abilities to invoke such impulses biologically. 3. The aesthetics of the human sciences becomes the empirical science of man's experiential and recognitive reac- tions to everything unknown, divided over the subjects: a. Psycho-physiological aesthetics The empirical science of man's spiritual and physical reactions to everything unknown: 1, destructive, 2. passively negligent as well as 3. actively absorbent reactions. b. Sociological aesthetics comprises the empirical science of the societal group's positive, nega- tive and passive reaction to the occurrence of the unknown in societal life and society's ability to invoke unknown phenomena in all areas, political, economic, technical, artistic, scientific, ethical, philosophi cal, cultural, ideological, religious, etc. c. The aesthetics of art scholarship This comprises the empirical science of man's expansive reactions to unknown external and internal impulses, as aesthetic art is defined as our ability to invoke and satisfy unknown interests, phenomena, things, thoughts and ideas. The aesthetics of art scholarship is divided into two groups, the aesthetics of direct experience and the aesthetics of indirect recognition, which can be grouped as follows: c.I. The aesthetics of human artistic action The empirical science of human reactions to what cannot be done; the interest in creating and enjoying unknown things, thoughts and pictures created by people. With connections to psycho-physiological and neurological aesthetics in general, this is divided into: 24 COSMONAUTS OF THE FUTURE Texts from the Situationist Movement in Scandinavia and Elsewhere a. The aesthetics of productive experience The empirical science of the process of human creative experience, which develops in a dialectical relationship of opposition and de- pendence to: b. The aesthetics of receptive experience The empirical science of the human ability to absorb aesthetic art experiences. Both are developed in connection with the artistic material which represents: c.II. The aesthetics of the art-work or the artistic means The empirical science of the character of the art object and its aes- thetic effect upon the producer and consumer, comprising: a. The aesthetic character of technique in general. b. Aesthetic technique or the fine arts which form: 1. Psychological sensory aesthetics The empirical science of immediate sensory effects (sound, pitch, light, colour, form, movement, etc.) 2. The aesthetics of mental conception The empirical science of the aesthetic effect of visual formula- tion and conception. This leads to the opposite of the aesthetics of experience: c.III. The aesthetics of recognition The empirical science of human intellectual reactions to what is not known. This is divided into two contrasting activities: a. The aesthetics of fantasy and speculation The empirical science of the human activity of idea and thought in the treatment of subjects neither understood nor known and the reactions of people to the results of such speculations and fantasies. Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 25 b. The aesthetics of scientific research The empirical science of human interest in and attempts to gather exact knowledge about hitherto unknown phenomena which can be analyzed empirically, as well as the abilities and means to do this, and the significance of this activity for human art and aes- thetics in general. The aesthetic phenomenon - summing up and definition Disinterested pleasure' Kant defined beauty as 'universal, disinterested and necessary pleasure but as pleasure is really nothing other than a kind of interest, we have to reject this self-contradictory definition and assert that aesthetics is the interest in the unknown, the effect of which can be unpleasant as well as pleasant, antipathetic as well as sympathetic. This brings out feelings of distaste or delight which give us the opportunity to judge the object of the experience as either ugly or beautiful, a biological reaction called attrac- tion and repulsion in the mineral world. The essence of aesthetics is unconditional and immediate interest or spontaneous reaction, and the aesthetic object is that phenomenon which invokes this immediate interest, whilst the aesthetic subject is the field of immediate interest. "Known and unknorn Beautiful are the things we see. More beautiful are the things we understand, but by far the most beautiful are surely those we do not comprehend." Niels Steno Only the unknown or the apparently and partially unknown can possess this aesthetic property. What one already knows is effective only through its recognizability and corresponds to those deeper, regular interests 26 COSMONAUTS OF THE FUTURE Texts from the Situationist Movement in Scandinavia and Elsewhere which, on the strength of their vital significance and regulatory essence, we call ethical interests. However, as soon as we become aware that the known and the unknown are relative phenomena, the question then becomes whether we can con- nect them with anything at all. We could say that the objectively known is everything that acts as facts, as impressions in the conteat of sensory material, and can be directly or indirectly sensed. But therefore it is not certain that we know it, and as in itself this is a matter of acquaintanceship or transmission, we must find another yardstick for the known and the unknown. What do these two concepts really mean? The latter is derived from the former as its opposite, but this does not take us very far, and we already appear to have excluded in advance any possibility of an empiri- cal analysis of this subject, as science, as is well known, is based upon the study of the comprehensible, the known or the actual. We are not, however, giving up, even though we will have to reduce the area of aesthetic study to the border phenomena between the known from which we start and the unknown, to the study of the unknown reactions of the known and the effect of unknown phenomena on the known. Aesthetics perceived as interest in the unknown "Habe nun, ach! Philosophie, Juristerie und Medizin und leider auch Theologie durchaus studiert, mit heissem Bemühn. Da steh' ich nun, ich armer Tor! und bin so klug als wie zuvor." Goethe Aesthetics as the law of change But what have we really embarked on here? Simply that the true point of departure of aesthetics is the law of change, allowing the unknown and the new to arise in the universe and create evolution, whereas the known is the Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 27 static cycle or law of immutability, which we have perceived as the ethical principle of nature. Here immediately we are in the elemental philosophi- cal conflict between compatibilists and incompatibilists, empiricists and idealists. The latter was a school founded by Socrates, who came to the conviction that 'we only know that we know nothing', that everything is unknown and thus aesthetic. We also know about the opposite school of determinists, and aver simply that they are both correct, in the same way as the scientists who quarrelled about whether light was rays or waves, since the law of change exists on the strength of and because of the law of immutability, in the same way as the radiant character of light is condi- tioned by its wave system, and the aesthetic principle of nature is precisely its radiant essence, the material's 'ideality' or éclat. We have thus transferred the world of the metaphysical concept over to matter, but can this work? Yes, it depends exclusively on whether it can form a system and if this system, which we regard as primary, connects naturally with the secondary spiritual or metaphysical system to form a unit. Subject or area of interest The elementary metaphysical concept is the subject, normally defined as "the conscious ego;, the observing, thinking, feeling, active individual, and thus the human object. But if we take into account how humanity origi- nated, this definition is too narrow. When did the human embryo begin to be a subject? The question is meaningless. Here we will use the concept of the subject as a designation for any exclusive or limited sphere of interest in matter, any system of action, any individuality. But the limited phe- nomenon in matter is what is called the object. Object and subject should thus only be two different ways of perceiving the same phenomena and two different sides of their essence. Quite so! This subjectivity of matter or classification of interest can be called the qualitative properties of the material, and the feeling, thinking and observing properties' are just the most consummate and differentiated means of existence of this subjectivity or sphere of interest, which here on earth has achieved the greatest perfection in humanity. 28 COSMONAUTS OF THE FUTURE Texts from the Situationist Movement in Scandinavia and Elsewhere Objective subjectivity Objective science is the science of how matter thinks, about the spirit of mat. ter. Subjective science could be called the science of how material feels, of the material's interests or the material's soul, its enthusiasms or eros, its body- forming principle. This science of the objective subjectivity of the material, which makes it corporeally identical with the spiritual and thus perceives the spiritual as a physical phenomenon, is obvious and easily understood if it is really made clear what an object or a body is. We can buy the materials in a human body at a chemist's shop, but we cannot unite them into a hu- man body, yet the human body endures even when the materials of which it is formed are renewed. One is the same even though one is someone else. We can shape a lump of clay into a vase and a sudden movement will change it again to a lump of clay. We can lay out a rail-track and constantly change all the material. Even if there are completely new materials, it is still the same track, the same region of interest, the same context. The bodily perception of the soul We are, however, in no doubt that the living person exists as a latent pos- sibility in the material we have bought. Thus the impotence we feel before a dead person whom we wish were alive is not caused by the soul forsaking the body. That it cannot do. But by the human soul having disintegrated, so that we are unable to put it together again. Therefore, unlike the spiritualists, we perceive the visionary faculty, the highest achievement of the aesthetician, not in the form of a detachment of the soul from its bodily mortal frame, but as a superior and intense radiation and receptive activity with its unavoidable centre in the physi- cal ego. From this it follows that we evaluate the proficiencies acquired by this clairvoyance according to their ability to serve our actions. With this, our opponent relationship to spiritualism in its traditional form appears to be clarified. The subjective context of material The word interest means what is between certain phenomena and thus the context. We have defined subjectivity as interest or context. Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 29 Every cell in the human body is an object and at the same time an area of interest, a subject or acting individual. Cells are again part of the areas of interest of the organs which in fellowship form a human ego, body or individual, together with his mental equipment. The individual is a part of the ego of the family, the group, whose common interest is given its self. conscious expression in its codex of action or ethics. Together all human groups, classes, peoples, nations and races form a joint human object, humanity, which is thus not an idea but an actuality, a body, an ego or subject, which is, for example, the common object of medical science and the very basis of actuality for the whole of technique and culture, the joint human interest. I call this perception Nordic humanism. Aesthetics as meaninglessness and cynicism "For a long time I boasted of possessing all possible landscapes, and found the celebrities of modern painting and poetry derisory. loved absurd pictures, fanlights, stage scenery, mountebanks' backcloths, inn-signs, cheap prints; unfashionable literature, church Latin, badly spelt pornographic books, grandmothers' novels, fairytales, little books for children, old operas, silly refrains, naive rhythms. I dreamed of crusades, voyages of discovery never reported, unrecorded republics, suppressed religious wars, revolutions in manners, movements of races and of continents: I believed in all enchantments." Arthur Rimbaud Secret interests We are, however, going beyond human, even organic subjectivity and maintaining that even the least atom with its rotating nuclear system, as well as the solar systems, must be perceived as spheres of interest, units of activity or subjects. The study of the interests of these materials and peo- ples is not only complicated but dangerous, especially as far the latter are 30 COSMONAUTS OF THE FUTURE Texts from the Situationist Movement in Scandinavia and Elsewhere concerned. Not everyone is interested in having their interest clarified and this is undoubtedly the real reason that an objective and scientific basis for the so-called human sciences' has not yet been established and that there is still no interest in doing so. Yet we have apparently got to the stage that today artistic, philosophical, ethical and aesthetic development is simply demanding the renewal that can only be established by the recognition and study of the objective subject. Subjective Knowledge "Who follows his own head must also stand on his own feet." Danish proverb We have stated that what is called objective knowledge is just the intellec- tual demonstration that a phenomenon exists in the world. But the word lenore has a more immediate sensory meaning, as when one says, I know myself. Here the word has the same meaning given to the Greek origin of the word aesthetics. Subjective knowledge is thus a direct context, an acknowledgement of a phenomenon. For a subject, the absolute known, that which is within bounds, is thus a part of the context, the established, the determined, the lare. The aesthetics of subjectivity "Everything like is unalike." However, we know that all phenomena, objects and spheres of interest are in constant change, are established, extended and dissolved, enter into other contexts, exchange, are condensed and exploded, that there are thus different degrees of acquaintanceship, right from the most airy and super- ficial to contextual, flowing and yet firm, compact, almost immobile and unbreakable connections, and that the aesthetic stage is thus the study of the superficial individual stages. Universal rationalism Aristotle, who in his metaphysics stressed the experience of this constant movement or change in matter by which it takes on new forms, maintained Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 31 that it is the realization of an all-embracing reasonable plan that the divine spirit is following in the shaping of the cosmos through the development of nature, which is gradually and logically following the purposeful meaning of our existence, with which human reason can lead us into harmony. The movement in, for example, a plant's genesis is invoked by 'external' causes (Aristotle was the first person who dissociated himself absolutely from objective subjectivism), like the seed from the mother-plant. But the form that occurs as a plant is because of an intrinsic power in matter, and thus in the seed, of a preordained kind (inheritance?). The seed thus contains the coming plant in itself as a possibility which could come into being or reality, be activated, be unfurled and take on an actual form that is the true being. Every form is in this way developed by other forms, and all these forms ultimately point back to the first cause which is consequently the absolute divine idea. The imbalance of matter "He also makes new who destroys the old." Even with due regard paid to Aristotle's doctrine of catharsis, this percep- tion can only be a half-truth, and therefore wrong, especially when its further enlargement in connection with Christianity's belief in providence and the doctrine of immortality is borne in mind. On the other hand, Hume's liberation of the purely deterministic perception of the world offers no opportunity for the establishment of an opponent relationship between aesthetics and ethics, but forces, as we have noted, the estab- lishment of the former as a side of the latter in the doctrine of pleasure. His philosophy thereby becomes purely analytical without a perspective of development, or what we could call positivity, inclination forward or imbalance, and this absolute equilibrium automatically forces the denial of the actual existence of the objective context, which is only delineated in the dynamic of motion and not in what is stationary. Then even a realistic ethics becomes an impossibility. 32 COSMONAUTS OF THE FUTURE Texts from the Situationist Movement in Scandinavia and Elsewhere We maintain the following: No providence exists for people other than our oven foresight, where ever we get that from, but we merely wish to maintain that it is always the present, existence, actuality or reality that manifests itself as the static and abso- lute, and that all development is and must be a break with the known, with lares, and takes place through the ceaseless dialectic between the establish- ment of lare and lawbreaking, between ethics and aesthetics. One-sided moral upbringing towards reason and justice, which incul- cates an absolute disgust of all stupidity, injustice, lies, brutality and heed- less, ugly self-assertion, to which orphanage children and future kings in particular are subjected, results in just as one-sided tendencies towards servility and desperation. Aesthetics as injustice, disaster and crime Law creates lawbreaking "You walk over dead men... of your jewels Horror not least charming and Murder, amongst your dearest trinkets, there on your proud belly dances amorously." Ch. Baudelaire: Hymn to Beauty On the other hand, it is health that changes the drama of life from be- ing a perpetual tragedy to being a principle of development. All renewal consists of casting oneself out into the unknown and thereby into almost certain annihilation, and even if it is the exception that proves the law or rule by renewing it, no successful renewal or introduction of the unknorn can happen without the context and the order being destroyed, crushed and dissolved to give way to new contexts. This revolutionary unrest, the unknown, incomprehensible and incompatibilistic element in existence, where the old is destroyed to give way to new, is the inevitable law of the universe and humanity. Incompatibilism is determined, and determinism acts only through this. The transcendent is immanent. Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 33 Lawbreaking creates lare "Diamonds are polished in diamond dust." Taras Bulba If one loses this understanding of the dialectical context between law and lawbreaking necessary to establish this, then, instead of perceiving lawbreaking as a necessary ingredient, one must necessarily feel it as a dis- turbing, destructive, devilish element in existence, as something absolutely wicked, as nature's tragic principle. By denying this absolute ideality and independence of the aesthetic we are turning away from the abstract doc- trine of suicide, which is its logical extreme point, and like everyone with 'sound common sense' also turning from what it demonstrates: that all development would stop if sound common sense' came to rule. Unforeseen happenings "Did you not see recently how eagerly the dove there over the treetops beat the air with its wings? He had seen his mate and the nest with the young: that was the reason for his quick flight. It appeared to him that it was under his own power that he moved his wings and took the shortest way. But it was love, his downy young and his beloved that awakened his soul, and this that thereafter moved his wings. Love is like the coachman who looks after the reins and controls us as the rider controls his horse. He obscures our soul and convinces us that we sit as chiefs or coachmen." Swedenborg The circle of interest dominates the cycle of materials and life. But things can suddenly happen that quite change the picture. It can so happen that the dove suddenly leaves his track. As if drawn by a strange force within or without, it is thrown up against quite different experiences that attract and entice it. Apparently, we say expressly, there is nothing here for it to like, let alone love. On the contrary, there is something immediately 34 COSMONA Movement in Scandinavia and Elsewhere loveless, something disquieting and unpleasant, something surprising, the unknown, and because this is new it is meaningless, irritating, unreason- able and worthless, but nevertheless a force, which, like the lighthouse or the lamp, could throw one off course, possibly even kill and annihilate, but which does, at any rate, innervate, interest, animate and obsess with an externally warm and inner cold excitement. Why -why not? "Misfortune often makes people pale, as hot water does lobsters; Why this? Yes, the whole aesthetic problem consists of just this why - why not? If the question is answered, the enchantment is lifted, the unknown has become known, but the incomprehensible is often just dissolved by this intervention in an even greater sum of unknowns. This is the essence of aesthetics. Is it of value but at the same time valueless, is there something harmonious in the paradoxical, something obvious in the unknown, in the insecurity and dissatisfaction? If one ac- cepts that this is the case, then one accepts the obviousness and meaning of aesthetics, the actuality of the illusion. The need to separate illusion from reality results in concepts of god, but the need to make illusion reality and reshape reality according to our illusions is aesthetic activity or what 'one calls the fine arts. The metaphysicians seek what is in this world, but not of this world. The aestheticians seek the precise opposite, what is of this world but not in it. The legality of the illegal "To do a great right, do a little wrong!" Shakespeare Aestheties is the ceaseless hunt of the universe, nature and humanity to prove that nothing supernatural exists, for the truth of aesthetics is namely nothing other than the naturalness of the unnatural, the humanity of the inhuman, the health of the anomalous and sick, the clarity of the dark- ness, the good fortune of misfortune, the competence and power of the Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 35 incompetent and powerless, the significance of the insignificant, the track of the trackless, the reality of the unreal, the rightness and the truth of the intolerable, of dislike, nastiness, faithlessness, lack of respect, disobedience, injustice, recklessness, cynicism, distrust, insincerity, falseness, immoral- ity, irresponsibility, crime and lawlessness, the order and utility of the ca- pricious, the ephemeral, the terrible, the awful, the doubtful, the uneven, the unusual and misplaced as well as the unusable, useless, inept, disordered and impractical, in short, all that is not interesting except in its immediate effect, the new, the radical, the original and experimental, the fertility of the earthquake. Aesthetics as repellent abnormality "When the Indian teaching about evil perceives God as just as much the source of evil as of good, thus in a way placing the Devil in the Trinity, is this not Hegelianism?" Soren Kierkegaard The pleasure of distaste This and nothing else is the immediate effect of the unknown in the known, the primary or extreme aesthetic effect, pure aesthetics. It is neither beau- tiful nor pleasant, but it is the raw material from which the beautiful is born, and, what is more, from which life itself is created. You will perhaps say it is impossible for the repellent to be the precon- dition for the attractive, but let us just push these phenomena into the distance a little, into the future of the past, in the example of memory, so that we can more easily see their attractive sides. How truly exciting and unforgettable, wonderful were those catastrophic events we experienced at that time, even though they were shocking, astonishing, terrible, upsetting, irritating, provocative, innervating and inspiring, and what a marvel it was that they strengthened us instead of crushing us and what a miracle that they really took place, even though we had perhaps not experienced themselves ourselves but had read about them in the newspaper or in a novel. It was sensational or, in short, aesthetic. 36 COSMONAUTS OF THE FUTURE Texts from the Situationist Movement in Scandinavia and Elsewhere Although we have thus pulled back from the phenomenon in order to perceive its meaning, we can nevertheless ascertain that this is the point that cannot be excluded - whether aesthetics should be made into a vital and independent function: the procurement of the unknown. Dysmorphism and abnormality "All sins are no more complicated than that they all would get their deathblow if one eradicated breach of confidence. Nis Petersen On the occasion of the breakthrough of Expressionism in Denmark, a certain Professor Salomonsen undertook a very notorious and ridiculed analysis of this new aesthetic phenomenon and came to the conclusion that it was a sort of "dysformism' or an ugliness-seeking epidemic, like the medieval self-tormentors, flagellants and other sick phenomena. So the man was quite right, but he just did not understand that the ugly is not ugly in itself, but is perceived so only because it is incomprehensible and unknown and therefore meaningless, and that therefore any renewal at once appears ugly, because the ugly is nothing other than the abnormal, and the ugliness grows with the size of the abnormality. Only in the instant the meaningless has been comprehended, possessed, owned or under- stood, does it become beautiful. Thus there is no way around it. If aesthetics is to have a meaning, it must be as the meaninglessness of existence, and if it is not to have mean- ing, then it thus becomes meaningless anyway. Aesthetics as curiosity and wonder "Zum Erstaunen bin ich da." Goethe Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 37 The interest of the new When something is neither lovely, good nor logical, but nevertheless at- tracts us, then this interest can only be explained as purely immediate interest, curiosity, wonder or astonishment. Curiosity is thus nature's primary aesthetic factor. 'The objects we meet for the first time immediately exercise a mental impression upon us; says the Russian painter Kandinsky, and in our need to collect rarities and rare experiences or strange and sensational articles, curiosities, we have the starting point of our aesthetic activity. This capac- ity and need is not associated only with humanity, even birds and insects can demonstrably develop such an aesthetic activity by the collection of strange stones, shells, pieces of metal ete. That even fish are immensely curious is known by everyone. According to these observations, the capacity for wonderment is thus the basic element of aesthetic activity. No one shows wonder at the nor- mal. But where does the abnormal come from? We are not the first who have banged our heads against this problem. However, we feel that it arises from within, as a part of the life process. The need for the new and the desire for adventure "Foreign food and forbidden fruit taste best: That certain reactions are normal or known is to say that they have direct preconceptions or demonstrable grounds. Where these are lacking, we are before unknown products of the known. As we do not reckon with actual unknown powers, we must perceive these activities as their own object, a selt-contradictory capacity in matter, as a sort of osmotic pressure in the spheres of interest, as innervating factors of tension, acting as an attrac- tion towards the unknown. One could call this need for the expansion of capacity for development the healthy sickness. Rationalists call it, char- acteristically enough, 'horror vacui, or fear of emptiness. The opposite description deciderium ad vacuum, longing for the unknown, the curiosity or aesthetic capacity of matter must be more correct. 38 COSMONAUTS OF THE FUTURE Texts from the Situationist Movement in Scandinavia and Elsewhere Aesthetics as tension, surprise or shock "The higher a species is the more uselessly it behaves. Hens do not write aphorisms." Nis Petersen New and useful The capacity for wonderment is thus a primary characteristic of the in- dividual's or species's stage of evolution. The human being is the most curious, whimsical and changeable being in nature. This is the reason for our power. In his history of Denmark, Professor Arup stresses that tattooing and the use of strange attachments are phenomena just as old as protective hide clothing. We venture to assert that they are older and that even hide clothing was originally only used to appear sensational. An old, emaciated and frozen shaman one day just discovered that it was warmer to keep the bearskin on all the time. We believe that any new development begins as something meaningless and worthless, from which the ability to create val- wes is conditioned by the ability to occupy oneself with the valueless, and that this law is not just valid in the world of art but also in the biological sphere, and even overall, because nothing new can immediately be correct. But can we consequently make curiosity and the capacity for wonder- ment into the elemental phenomenon of aesthetics without further ado? It has to be said that it was not us who discovered this placing. Throughout the centuries and right up to Surrealism, surprise or shock has been per- ceived as a basic factor in the sphere of aesthetic experience. Surprise and wonderment "For him beauty was always the hidden." G. Brandes on M. Goldschmidt Writing of unreasonable, pre-logical or irrational actuality, that border phenomenon between the existing and non-existent, Descartes says Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 39 (although he exchanges pure wonderment with its sympathetic offshoot admiration) that 'admiration (wonderment), that is to say first and fore- most surprise, is the only thing that does not rest upon an organie process, but exclusively on the state of the brain.' That his latter statement about the activity of the brain alone is dis- proved by the fact that we are able to evoke the shock of surprise by purely physical means (with insulin shock, etc.), and that we have recognized the organic character of the brain and nervous system changes nothing in the condition we have here, which is the essence of surprise itself: the break with the organic, that is, the anti-organic effect in matter. Aesthetics as opportunity or possibility "Writing forewords is like remarking that one is in the process of falling in love. The soul searches restlessly. The puzzle is given up. Every event is a hint of explanation. Writing a foreword is like bending a branch to the side in the jasmine cabin and seeing her sitting there secretly: my love. - and how is he who writes this? he goes amongst people like a dupe in winter and a fool in summer, he is hello and goodbye in the same person, always happy and carefree, pleased with himself, a feckless gadabout, yes, an immoral person. Soren Kierkegaard Luck in misfortune Here we are at the very core of extreme aesthetics, its lack of precondi- tons, its groundlessness, its non-dialectical curtness towards nothingness, to what it is directed towards and seeks to overcome. This position as the negation of nothingness abolishes the normal dialectic of thesis, antithesis and synthesis. It is the thesis that seeks the unknown antithesis, and the ganne is a merciless either - or, luck or misfortune, renewal or an nihilation, and we cannot therefore call aesthete reactions true causal reactions, as we reject all theories of divine guidance, being forced to perceive them as 40 COSMONAUTS OF THE FUTURE Texts from the Situationist Movement in Scandinavia and Elsewhere secretions, provocations, reactions of opportunity or possibility, as this is their immediate aspect, and this is precisely what we are trying to bring out. The paradox of aesthetic science "There are some truths, at least, of a particular modesty and tick- lishness of which one does not come into possession if not suddenly - that one must surprise or abandon." Fr. Niet&sche But how can one make science in this way? Let us explain our position. The disinterested research which is the mechanism of science is a result of human interest in its purest form, interest in being interested. We want to maintain this state, even though the result of the research influences our other interests and develops and renews them. However self-contradictory this may seem, we could thus well interest ourselves in something that for us does not exist, in the unknown, but the real paradox lies in our interest consisting of wanting to know the un- Inoren. When we have achieved this, the object of our research dissolves in our hands. This is what makes the establishment of the science of aesthetic experience so enormously difficult. Acquaintanceship or experience hills and dissolves the unknown, the aesthetic object. From being interesting it becomes unimportant. But this is an inner subjective process. Therefore if we are to work on the problem, we must find a method to keep the interest awake, to preserve our wonderment. However, as scientific truth is pre- cisely the opposite of this, we can only approach it in short lightning visits that leave as few traces as possible, in order to keep the ability for experi- ence awake and vitality intact in us. Life cannot be studied in a cadaver, nor experience in knowledge, nor fire in ashes. Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 41 Aesthetics as fanaticism and intolerance "It is strange that people are so angry with the Jesuits. In a certain sense, everyone who is enthusiastic about an idea and wishes only its realization is to that extent a Jesuit." Soren Kierkegaard Self-forgetfulness versus memory Burnt children fear the fire, they say, but this is not so for foolish or forget- ful children, for what is forgotten is also new. One must thus have a short memory to continue to be a good aesthetician, whilst one must have a long and good memory to be a significant scientist, as science is nothing other than experience, recollection or memory. Aesthetic understanding is the completely intolerant will or control, the absolute talent. Scientific understanding is complete tolerance, disinterest- edness, the all-forgiving lack of talent. To contain enough of both these characteristics to establish an aesthetic science has not hitherto been vouchsafed anyone, and we would not assert that we have it. We would just like to point out that in any such expla- nation one has to evaluate whether the passion of the idea is sound and well, and that the necessary experience for this is not achieved through the experience of the art of others and imagined experiences, but only through an intense and conscious experience of the aesthetic and artistic process during its creation, during the transformation of matter to a sphere of interest or art. An aesthetic science must not only be true, it must also be interesting, not just useless ashes but firewood or artistic proficiency. The need for non-critical experience "Experience is the best teacher." Don't talk, artist - create!' they say, and even if it is from time to time necessary to open one's mouth to correct certain misunderstandings, there is something right about this. If only one could then get the artist, and incidentally also the viewer, to stop listening to what people who don't understand art say about it. Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 41 Aesthetics as fanaticism and intolerance "It is strange that people are so angry with the Jesuits. In a certain sense, everyone who is enthusiastic about an idea and wishes only its realization is to that extent a Jesuit." Soren Kierkegaard Self-forgetfulness versus memory Burnt children fear the fire, they say, but this is not so for foolish or forget- ful children, for what is forgotten is also new. One must thus have a short memory to continue to be a good aesthetician, whilst one must have a long and good memory to be a significant scientist, as science is nothing other than experience, recollection or memory. Aesthetic understanding is the completely intolerant will or control, the absolute talent. Scientific understanding is complete tolerance, disinterest- edness, the all-forgiving lack of talent. To contain enough of both these characteristics to establish an aesthetic science has not hitherto been vouchsafed anyone, and we would not assert that we have it. We would just like to point out that in any such expla- nation one has to evaluate whether the passion of the idea is sound and well, and that the necessary experience for this is not achieved through the experience of the art of others and imagined experiences, but only through an intense and conscious experience of the aesthetic and artistic process during its creation, during the transformation of matter to a sphere of interest or art. An aesthetic science must not only be true, it must also be interesting, not just useless ashes but firewood or artistic proficiency. The need for non-critical experience "Experience is the best teacher." Don't talk, artist - create!' they say, and even if it is from time to time necessary to open one's mouth to correct certain misunderstandings, there is something right about this. If only one could then get the artist, and incidentally also the viewer, to stop listening to what people who don't understand art say about it. 42 COSMONAUTS OF THE FUTURE Texts from the Situationist Movement in Scandinavia and Elsewhere He who will not listen, has to feel; is another saying, and as feeling is aesthetics precisely, this explains something fundamental: that the aesthe tician will not be content with secondhand experiences, but will get into the hard school of the facts themselves. It is the task of aesthetics to confront people constantly with themselves and their own experiences, to get them to feel and believe more in their own feelings and sensations than in the words of others. This Doubting Thomas attitude is neither an expression of lack of faith nor sepsis, but, on the contrary, of an expression of a need for experience without criticism that will realize the idea, the fantasy, the performance and the word in sensory perception. When the aesthetician reads a sign The ice is unsafe;, then for him this is not just an invitation to see whether the sign is true, but also to see how unsafe ice feels. This is the precondition of aesthetics, development and progress: that one gets on thin ice. Aesthetics as surplus of power or luxury "The superfluous, a very necessary thing." Voltaire The aggressivity of the desire for experience Children and naive, forgetful and inexperienced people have their el- mental aesthetic areas intact. They marvel easily and are without routine because of their ignorance. Consequently there is something childish in preserving one's aesthetic need: one's capacity for wonderment, the long- ing for the new, for possibilities, for following one's impulses, whims, eater- nal causes and preambles, the invitations, temptations and provocations of others, the predilection for openings, introductions, beginnings and sketches, one's capacity for impulsive, immediate and unpremeditated ac- tion. It is called keeping oneself young. This initiatory capacity in children and young people with the great possibilities for development is a natural power for growth. It is an aggres- sion or conquest, a reaching out beyond the static ego. Asger Jorn Luck and Chance Dagger and Guitar 43 But one must not forget that children, idiots and naive people are also more limited and bigoted than experienced and developed people, because all organisms seek stability, limitation or morals. They therefore have to smash and destroy in order to develop, and as they neither understand nor know nor recognize anything other than their own world, they perceive many of the actions of developed people as meaningless, incomprehen- sible and unnecessary occupations, as games or secret black magic and wizardry, and will behave accordingly. If one has absorbed or rejected all the normal skills and knowledge, but has nevertheless preserved one's childishness' or need for wonderment, then one will be drawn towards the unknown in human society and be- come a conqueror, adventurer or researcher in the fabrications of the life of the imagination, the inventions of art life and the discoveries of science, if one does not simply become an oppressor or exploiter of other people. Held & hasard. Dolk & guitar [1952] (Copenhagen: Skandinavisk Institut for Sammenlignende Vandalisme & Borgen, 1963), pp. 17-30 & 33-52. Translated by Peter Shield. musicophilia 268